J. Blouin et al., ENCODING TARGET-TRUNK RELATIVE POSITION - CERVICAL VERSUS VESTIBULAR CONTRIBUTION, Experimental Brain Research, 122(1), 1998, pp. 101-107
The contribution of cervical and vestibular cues in signaling the chan
ges in target-trunk relative positions during self-motion was investig
ated. Normal subjects (Ss) were shown a LED flashed in the peripheral
visual field in a dark room. Ss were then passively rotated about the
vertical axis in one of three different conditions: (1) head chair-fix
ed (vestibular condition); (2) head earth-fixed (relaxed neck conditio
n); and (3) head earth-fixed, but with the Ss actively attempting to t
urn it (activated neck condition). The Ss were then required to indica
te, with their unseen index finger, the position of the previously fla
shed target. It was found that pointing at the memorized target was si
milarly accurate in the relaxed neck condition and in the activated ne
ck condition. In the vestibular condition, pointing accuracy dropped s
ignificantly. These results suggest that neck proprioceptive signals a
re more effective than vestibular ones in signaling relative changes i
n the position of stationary objects with respect to the body during h
ead-trunk motion. The finding that cervically mediated estimates were
unchanged during active contraction of the neck muscles may suggests t
hat efference copy signals may help interpete the change in the affere
nt signals caused by voluntary neck muscle activation.