Wc. Dodson et al., A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF THE METHODS OF SPERM PREPARATION FOR INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION, Fertility and sterility, 70(3), 1998, pp. 574-575
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of three methods of sperm prep
aration for IUI during superovulation of infertile women. Design: Rand
omized assignment of one of three sperm preparation methods. Setting:
University infertility practice. Patient(s): Infertile couples undergo
ing superovulation and IUI. Intervention(s): The method of preparation
of sperm for IUI during superovulation was assigned randomly to doubl
e centrifugation, multiple-tube swim-up, or Percoll density gradient.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Total number and percent recovery of motile s
perm, percent of recovered sperm with normal morphology, and cycle fec
undity. Result(s): No method of sperm preparation provided better cycl
e fecundity than the others despite differences in sperm recovery. Con
clusion(s): Double centrifugation, multiple-tube swim-up, and Percoll
density gradient sperm preparation for IUI yield similar cycle fecundi
ty rates. (Fertil Steril(R) 1998;70:574-5. (C) 1998 by American Societ
y for Reproductive Medicine.).