Mental maps are widely used to represent aggregate residential prefere
nces in a population. This study examines the contention by researcher
s that the dominant viewpoint in a group in terms of residential desir
ability is not affected by the fuzziness in individual space preferenc
es. Results indicate that a significant misrepresentation of group pre
ferences can result when fuzziness of individual preferences is overlo
oked. The use of ordinal scales to generate mental maps is likely to d
istort the actual pattern of residential preferences that dominates in
the group because of the failure of the ranking approach to account f
or imprecision and ambiguity in individual preferences. Because interv
al scales used in rating or evaluating tasks do not force individuals
to give a crisp judgement of places, they are more adequate than ordin
al scales for mental mapping and for behavioral analysis.