COMBINING VOLUME-WEIGHTED MEAN NUCLEAR VOLUME WITH GLEASON SCORE AND CLINICAL STAGE TO PREDICT MORE RELIABLY DISEASE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER
K. Fujikawa et al., COMBINING VOLUME-WEIGHTED MEAN NUCLEAR VOLUME WITH GLEASON SCORE AND CLINICAL STAGE TO PREDICT MORE RELIABLY DISEASE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER, The Prostate, 37(2), 1998, pp. 63-69
BACKGROUND. Various criteria for patients with prostate cancer have be
en reported to be of prognostic value, and we have reported that estim
ates of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume (MNV), developed by Gunder
sen and Jensen based on a stereological technique, accurately predict
the prognosis of prostate cancer. However, all of these studies were c
on ducted on cases in a single institution, and it has remained unclea
r whether MNV calculations obtained at one institution apply to cases
at another institution. Ln attempting to solve this problem, we made a
prognostic index (P.I.) based on data from one hospital, and tested w
hether these data could be used to predict the prognosis of patients a
t another hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective, multivaria
te prognostic study of 195 patients with prostate cancer, diagnosed at
Kyoto University Hospital and treated conservatively, indicated that
clinical stage, Gleason score, and MNV were all significantly correlat
ed with the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer. From the relat
ive strengths of these prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis,
the following P.I. was constructed: P.I. = Clinical stage x 1.8040 + G
leason score x 1.5245 + MNV x 2.3162 (the constants correspond to the
risk ratio estimated by Cox analysis). The P.I. was calculated for 104
patients with prostate cancer diagnosed at Shizuoka City Hospital and
treated conservatively for analysis of disease-specific survival. RES
ULTS. The prognostic index ranged from 3.841-16.142. Using the median
value of 12.5 as a cutoff point, a clear separation of cases with poor
and favorable prognosis was achieved (P < 0.0001, observation period:
1-167 months). CONCLUSIONS. The results of this study suggest that es
timates of MNV can be evaluated at multiple institutions with the use
of P.I. calculation. Furthermore, combining estimates of MNV with Glea
son score and clinical stage predicts most powerfully disease outcome
of patients with prostate cancer. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.