E. Cohen et al., COMPARISON OF KETOROLAC AND DICLOFENAC IN THE TREATMENT OF RENAL COLIC, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 54(6), 1998, pp. 455-458
Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of ketorolac an
d diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic. Methods: In a double-bli
nd, randomized clinical trial, 57 patients admitted to the emergency r
oom for renal colic, received either 30 mg of ketorolac or 75 mg of di
clofenac i.m. (intramuscularly). Evaluations were performed at 1, 2 h
and 6 h after treatment. Pain was assessed by a four-point verbal rati
ng scale (VRS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Only patients with a
t least moderate pain according to the VRS were included. Seventy-five
milligrams of pethidine i.m. was given as rescue medicine, if insuffi
cient analgesia was achieved. The adverse effects recorded were sedati
on, nausea and vomiting. Results: There was no significant difference
between ketorolac and diclofenac, with respect to pain level over time
, the number of patients requiring rescue medicine, or the level of ad
verse effects. Conclusion: Ketorolac and diclofenac are equally effect
ive in the treatment of renal colic.