Rm. Fiorella et al., CYTOLOGIC DISTINCTION BETWEEN BRONCHIOALVEOLAR CARCINOMA AND REACTIVEREPARATIVE RESPIRATORY EPITHELIUM - A CYTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS/, Diagnostic cytopathology, 19(4), 1998, pp. 270-273
Cytologically the distinction between bronchioalveolar carcinoma and r
eactive/reparative, processes of respiratory epithelium can be difficu
lt. Retrospectively we have identified II consecutive cases of bronchi
oalveolar carcinoma front the cytology files of University Missouri-Ka
nsas City/Truman Medical Center: On average, a combined 5.71 cytologic
/histologic procedures were performed before reaching a definitive dia
gnosis for this group. An additional seven random cases of reactive/re
parative respiratory cases of adult respiratory distress syndrome pati
ents were used as a control. Cytomorphometric analysis was performed.
The mean average nuclear diameter for the carcinoma group was 13.76 mu
m and for the reactive/reparative group was 13.29 mu m. There was no
statistical difference between the two groups (paired student t test P
>.05). It appears from our data that mean nuclear diameter is not a d
iscriminator for the cytologic distinction between bronchioalveolar ca
rcinoma and reactive/reparative respiratory epithelium and that the ac
cepted cytologic parameters of for bronchioalveolar carcinoma are,more
valid (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss,Inc.