METHODOLOGIC ISSUES IN LOW-BACK-PAIN RESEARCH IN PRIMARY-CARE

Citation
Lm. Bouter et al., METHODOLOGIC ISSUES IN LOW-BACK-PAIN RESEARCH IN PRIMARY-CARE, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 23(18), 1998, pp. 2014-2020
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics,"Clinical Neurology
ISSN journal
03622436
Volume
23
Issue
18
Year of publication
1998
Pages
2014 - 2020
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(1998)23:18<2014:MIILRI>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Study Design. Narrative review and discussion of the selected literatu re. Objectives. To discuss some important methodologic challenges in l ow back pain research in primary care. Summary of Background Data. Man y methodologic problems must be confronted when conducting low back pa in research. Some of these problems are back pain specific or specific to the primary care setting. Methods. Methodologic problems related t o four research issues wilt be discussed: study designs, definition of low back pain, determinants of low back pain, and outcome assessment. Results. Two fundamentally different study designs are frequently use d in low back pain research, namely observational studies and experime ntal studies. The definition of low back pain is typically restricted to a highly variable self-reported symptom, the sensation of pain in t he back. There clearly is a need for an evidence-based classification system for low back pain. Because a tenable theoretical framework is l acking, it is difficult to know which determinants of low back pain sh ould be quantified. Low back pain studies focus usually on health-rela ted quality-of-life outcome parameters. The identification of the mini mum clinically relevant changes for the most important outcome instrum ents needs further consideration. Conclusions. In years to come, low b ack pain researchers are challenged to overcome some of these (and oth er) problems to enhance the quality of low back pain research in prima ry care.