In 1992 it was estimated that 30 x 10(12) g more methane was emitted i
nto the atmosphere than was removed, with animals being considered the
largest single anthropogenic source. Ruminants produce 97% of the met
hane generated in enteric fermentation by animals. Estimates for metha
ne emissions from animal wastes vary between 6 and 31% of that produce
d directly by the animal, with the most likely value being between 5 a
nd 10% globally. Although methanogenic bacteria can improve the effici
ency of fermentation preventing the accumulation of reducing ruminal h
ydrogen, alternative means of channelling hydrogen and electrons are p
ossible. Methane inhibitors can reduce methane emissions to zero in th
e short term but due to microbial adaptation the effects of these comp
ounds are quickly neutralized and feed intake is often depressed Metha
ne emissions can be reduced by about 18% through the use of ionophores
in the short term but there are indications that methanogens as well
as other,members of the microbial population can adapt to their presen
ce. Defaunation reduces methane production by 20 to 50% depending upon
diet. Although methane production can be reduced by including unsatur
ated fatty acids in the diet, the metabolizable energy content of the
diet may not be improved by such additions. Methane emissions per unit
of feed consumed from sheep and cattle fed hay diets appear to be qui
te similar but differences between other ruminants have been measured
The most practical way of influencing methane Emissions per unit produ
ct is to increase productivity level since the proportion of feed ener
gy required to just maintain the animal will be reduced, methane produ
ction falls with increased intake level, and the animal may go to mark
et sooner. The most promising avenues for future research for reducing
methanogenesis are the development of new products for reducing proto
zoal numbers in the rumen and the use of bacterocins or other compound
s which specifically target methanogenic bacteria.