The World Wide Web and other forms of Internet communication provide a
new venue for political discourse. The Present study surveyed Web pos
tings relevant to the 1996 Presidential race between Bill Clinton and
Bob Dole. It identified two types of sites. Nonparodic or serious site
s emulated traditional news such as is found in newspapers, periodical
s, and television news documentaries. Parodic sites sought to entertai
n rather than inform the reader and to hold reader attention. Parodic
sites ostensibly exposed candidates' questionable practices by way of
allegation, innuendo, expose, parody, and slander. To expose deceptive
practices, the authors of parodic Websites themselves engaged in dece
ption. Political parodic Websites presented a postmodern communication
environment where the identity of the author, the stability of the te
xt, and the audience itself were all fragmented. Browsing these politi
cal Websites was a recursive activity where one could participate in p
seudo polls, sign bogus petitions, and play political computer games.
Such activities provided the illusion of political participation and d
id little to decrease public cynicism about politics or the political
process.