Jh. Newman, RAPPROCHEMENT AMONG UNDERGRADUATE PSYCHOLOGY, SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, The American psychologist, 53(9), 1998, pp. 1032-1043
A discourse originating at liberal arts colleges has begun to influenc
e national policy for science, mathematics, engineering, and technolog
y education. The discovery-oriented, research-rich curriculum traditio
nal for the graduate student is being developed for wider implementati
on in the service of new national goals. Though largely absent as a pa
rticipant, the discipline of psychology has a great deal to contribute
to and gain from joining in this agenda. The content of our field has
many direct applications to the issues under consideration. I We have
common interests as a scientific field in developing science educatio
n. And, interdisciplinary and interinstitutional cooperation would be
invigorating and constructive for our science, for our scholarship, an
d for our students. Psychologists should be proactive, not passive or
reactive, in the improvement of undergraduate science education. This
article presents both an invitation and an argument for fostering a ne
w scientific and educational rapprochement.