The ancient view that plants ore non-sexual because they hold a place
below animals on the ladder of nature was still held by many scientist
s in the 18th century. Paradoxically, at this time, Linnaeus and other
s were also postulating the universality of plant sexuality by using a
nalogies with animals to overextend the slowly emerging experimental e
vidence about the functions of floral parts. Today's school leavers se
em to have similarly diverse views. A lack of school focus on gamete f
usion appears to result in a continuing reliance on analogies with ani
mals, and a belief that plants undergo only a qualified version of sex
ual reproduction. Suggestions for classroom activities to overcome thi
s are offered, and some wider implications are considered.