THE MANAGEMENT OF, AND FISHERY FOR, AMERICAN EEL ELVERS IN THE MARITIME PROVINCES, CANADA

Authors
Citation
Bm. Jessop, THE MANAGEMENT OF, AND FISHERY FOR, AMERICAN EEL ELVERS IN THE MARITIME PROVINCES, CANADA, Bulletin francais de la peche et de la pisciculture, (349), 1998, pp. 103-116
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Fisheries
ISSN journal
07672861
Issue
349
Year of publication
1998
Pages
103 - 116
Database
ISI
SICI code
0767-2861(1998):349<103:TMOAFF>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
The fishery for American eel, Anguilla rostrata, elvers in the Scotia- Fundy area of Atlantic Canada has, since inception in 1989, increased catches from 26 kg to about 3 000 kg in 1996. Development of the fishe ry has been tightly controlled with nine licenses presently (1996) iss ued, three of which are restricted to aquaculture use. No elver fisher y is permitted in rivers in which an active fishery for larger eels ex ists, each license has a quota of up to 1 ton, with a limit of 300 kg from any given river, and records of daily catch and fishing effort, b y gear type, are now required for each river fished. Eiver catches and CPUE vary geographically, being highest along the south shore and low er Bay of Fundy areas of Nova Scotia, moderately high along the lower Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick, and lowest along the eastern shore of Nov a Scotia and upper Bay of Fundy areas (Minas Basin and Chignecto Bay). In all areas but the eastern shore of Nova Scotia, commercial quantit ies of elvers first arrive in April. Elver catch peaks during May, the n declines through June with small (less than 1% of total) catches occ urring in some areas during early July. Geographic differences in elve r catches and run timing may be linked to oceanographic current patter ns, particularly the southwestward flow of the Nova Scotia Current alo ng the Atlantic coast and the counter-clockwise flow around the Bay of Fundy, and differences in the timing of rising river water temperatur es during spring. Elver run size was not proportional to river size (d rainage area) for two rivers from different geographic areas nor was e lver fishery catch-per-unit-fishing effort proportional to river drain age area, perhaps because of geographic differences in elver density.