C. Stroszczynski et al., CHOROIDAL HEMANGIOMA - MR FINDINGS AND DIFFERENTIATION FROM UVEAL MELANOMA, American journal of neuroradiology, 19(8), 1998, pp. 1441-1447
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology","Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to establish the MR
imaging characteristics of choroidal hemangioma and to compare them wi
th those of uveal melanoma, METHODS: Among 41 patients examined at 1.5
T (4-cm surface coil, T1-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequ
ences), 25 had uveal melanoma and 16 had circumscribed choroidal heman
gioma. After IV bolus injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine, dynamic
and T1-weighted sequences were acquired. RESULTS: In patients with cho
roidal hemangioma, uniform signal characteristics were detected on fas
t T2-weighted images. In 15 of 16 patients with choroidal hemangioma,
lesions were isointense with vitreous on fast spin-echo T2-weighted im
ages, whereas lesions in 24 of 25 patients with uveal melanoma were hy
pointense, Signal characteristics of uveal melanoma and hemangioma did
not differ significantly on plain T1-weighted images. Enhancement was
earlier and much stronger for circumscribed choroidal hemangioma than
for uveal melanoma. After TV bolus application of gadopentetate dimeg
lumine, the increase of signal intensity was higher for circumscribed
choroidal hemangioma (signal intensity ratio, 5.8) than for uveal mela
noma (signal intensity ratio, 2.2). CONCLUSION: Circumscribed choroida
l hemangioma may be difficult to differentiate from melanoma by ophtha
lmologic examination, Differentiation may not be possible if direct vi
ewing of uveal space-occupying lesions is hampered by opaque vitreous
media, The characteristic findings on fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR im
ages and early enhanced images aid in differentiating choroidal hemang
ioma from uveal melanoma.