Alikomiak and Tatamigana were the first Inuit tried and executed for m
urder under Canadian law. The case was the third in a series of killin
gs of outsiders by Inuit in the western Arctic which had begun in 1912
; the first two had resulted in more lenient treatment. The trial of t
hese two men, which took place in the summer of 1923, was in the natur
e of a show trial, designed by the federal government to show the Inui
t that the authorities would no longer tolerate such acts of violence.
It was also meant to be a demonstration to the world of Canada's sove
reign rights in the Arctic, rights which had an uncertain foundation i
n international law. The conviction and execution of Alikomiak and Tat
amigana caused controversy at the time; sentiment for clemency was bas
ed on claims (made then and subsequently) that Inuit were simple and p
rimitive, and did not understand the principle of execution for murder
. It is asserted here, however, that the sentence was entirely in keep
ing with Inuit custom, and that alternatives to execution suggested by
those with better knowledge of the North were in some ways even harsh
er than capital punishment. Extracts from the capital case file and th
e transcripts of the trial make these paints clear.