Fa. Sloan et al., THE INFLUENCE OF OBSTETRIC NO-FAULT COMPENSATION ON OBSTETRICIANS PRACTICE PATTERNS, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 179(3), 1998, pp. 671-676
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine level of satisfaction amo
ng obstetricians with the no-fault insurance programs in Florida and V
irginia and to study any reported practice patterns attributable to im
plementation of no-fault compensation. STUDY DESIGN: Structured survey
s were conducted with 119 obstetricians in Florida and Virginia. RESUL
TS: More than 90% of obstetricians were enrolled in no-fault insurance
programs, but only 13% reported having had a patient compensated by a
no-fault program. Only 14% knew of a colleague with a patient who had
been compensated. Despite no-fault compensation, threat of lawsuits w
as a factor in 39% of cases of physicians who quit practicing obstetri
cs. The no-fault programs did not cause obstetricians to report increa
ses in their obstetric caseloads or in their fraction of patients at h
igh risk. Overall, obstetricians were far more satisfied with the no-f
ault system than with the tort system. Still, more than half of the re
spondents expressed dissatisfaction with premiums assessed by no-fault
insurance. CONCLUSION: Obstetricians who knew about the no-fault prog
rams were generally satisfied with their performance. However, the no-
fault programs have not built a constituency with physicians, and the
programs are relatively small in their scope of coverage. No-fault com
pensation thus has had minor impact on reported obstetric practice. To
be effective in improving patient access, no-fault compensation must
be broader in scope.