Dl. Davis et al., RETHINKING BREAST-CANCER RISK AND THE ENVIRONMENT - THE CASE FOR THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE, Environmental health perspectives, 106(9), 1998, pp. 523-529
The World Health Organization recently reported that breast cancer has
become the most common cancer in women throughout the world. Known ri
sk factors account for less than half of all cases of breast cancer, a
nd inherited germ line mutations occur in at most only 10% of all case
s. Cumulative exposure to estradiol and other hormones links many of t
he established risk factors for breast cancer. This paper reviews epid
emiologic and toxicologic evidence on breast cancer risks and presents
a comprehensive construct of risk factors intended to focus on the id
entification of those factors that can be controlled or modified. We a
ttempt to provide a framework for interpreting the etiologic interplay
of endogenous metabolic changes and environmental changes in the etio
logy of breast cancer. The construct we develop distinguishes between
those risk factors that are directly causal, such as ionizing radiatio
n and inherited germ cell defects, those vulnerability factors that ex
tend the time period during which the breast undergoes development, an
d those contributing factors that increase total hormonal stimulation
of the breast. Some hormonally active compounds, such as those in soy
and broccoli and other phytoestrogen-containing foods, can be protecti
ve against breast cancer, while others, such as some environmental con
taminants, appear to increase the risk of the disease by increasing le
vels of harmful hormones. Efforts to explain patterns of breast cancer
should distinguish between these different risk factors. Identificati
on of vulnerability and contributing risk factors can foster the devel
opment of public policy to reduce the burden of this prevalent cancer,
prudent precautionary principles suggest that reducing exposure to av
oidable or modifiable risk factors should receive high priority from t
he public and private sectors.