Js. Edgerly et al., A SEASONAL SHIFT IN EGG-LAYING BEHAVIOR IN RESPONSE TO CUES OF FUTURECOMPETITION IN A TREEHOLE MOSQUITO, Journal of Animal Ecology, 67(5), 1998, pp. 805-818
1. We tested a set of hypotheses to predict egg-laying behaviour in Ae
des triseriatus in the field in Massachusetts. These hypotheses reflec
t three main themes: females avoid competitive or predatory threats to
their larvae; females judge larvae or eggs as cues to future permanen
ce or productivity within a treehole; and females are either opportuni
stic ovipositors, or hedge their bets by scattering their eggs in mult
iple habitats. We predicted that mosquitoes might vary in their respon
se depending on whether their offspring will hatch immediately or ente
r diapause and hatch the next year. 2. We stocked artificial treeholes
with larvae at four densities ranging from 0 to 90 larvae per habitat
for four trials in 1992 and eight trials in 1994. In 1992, we added p
redatory Anopheles barberi larvae to half the replicates of each densi
ty level. In 1994, we tested for an interaction between egg and larval
density by stocking additional traps with eggs in batches of 0, 20 an
d 200, and larvae in densities as in the previous trials. 3. The popul
ation revealed a significant interaction between time of year and larv
al density. More eggs accumulated in traps stocked with fewer larvae (
0 or 15) early in the season, but females showed a slight positive res
ponse to higher densities (45 or 90) later on, after their offspring w
ere all likely to enter diapause. These results suggest that potential
ambiguities of larval cues,with indications of habitat permanence as
well as adversity of future competition, are resolved by females. Fema
les did not respond differentially to the predatory Anopheles barberi
larvae. 4. The estimated batch size obtained in oviposition traps did
not differ from the fecundity of field-caught females allowed to ovipo
sit under confinement in laboratory vials, suggesting that bet-hedging
by scattering of eggs among multiple habitats did not occur. 5. An un
expected result, a positive response to higher egg densities, is discu
ssed in light of studies on other insects. This result conflicts with
our predictions based on females choosing less competitive environment
s for their larvae and also conflicts with previously published accoun
ts of avoidance of eggs in this species. Preference for habitats with
conspecific eggs might be explained if eggs reflect habitat stability
or if larvae gain an advantage from being in an aggregation. Neither h
ypothesis is resolved by the present study.