N. Vrbjar et al., PBN SPIN-TRAPPING OF FREE-RADICALS IN THE REPERFUSION-INJURED HEART -LIMITATIONS FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS, Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 186(1-2), 1998, pp. 107-115
Post-ischemic reperfusion causes cardiac dysfunction and radical-induc
ed lipid peroxidation (LPO) detectable by ESR spin trapping. This stud
y deals with the applicability of the spin trapping technique to pharm
acological investigations during myocardial reperfusion injury. The us
e of the spin trap phenylbutylnitrone (PBN, 3 mM) in isolated rat hear
ts demonstrated the release of alkoxyl radicals (a(N) = 1.39 mT, a(H)(
beta) = 0.19 mT) formed particularly within the first 15 min of reperf
usion following 30 min of ischemia. The decline of radicals, after 10
min of reperfusion, was accompanied by recovery of function in 80% of
the hearts. The radical concentration in the coronary effluent (maximu
m after 7.5 min) was reduced by the infusion of 1 mM mercaptopropionyl
glycine (MPG, 2.7 +/- 0.5 U/ml, p < 0.001) or 5 mu M vitamin E (11.7 /- 0.8 U/ml, p < 0.001), compared to the (PBN-containing) control (29.
7 +/- 4.3 U/ml). Moreover, functional recovery (left ventricular devel
oped pressure, LVDP 91.6 +/- 20% of pre-ischemic level, p < 0.05) was
improved by the hydrophilic radical scavenger MPG, compared to the (PB
N containing) control (LVDP 50.5 +/- 15.7% of baseline). PBN alone led
to higher functional recovery (p < 0.05) and reduced VF (duration of
ventricular fibrillation; 7.10 +/- 0.36 min/30 min, p < 0.05), compare
d to the untreated (PBN-free) control (LVDP 26.6 +/- 11.8%; VF 19.42 /- 3.64 min/30 min). The Ca antagonist verapamil (0.1 mu M), MPG, and
the lipophilic vitamin E showed cardioprotection in the absence of PEN
: post-ischemic recovery of LVDP was 25.4 +/- 6.8% (p < 0.05), 39.6 +/
- 12.7% (p < 0.05) and 52.4 +/- 2.6% (p < 0.01), respectively, compare
d to the corresponding untreated control (13.3 +/- 6.6%). Whereas vera
pamil and vitamin E were able to protect the heart when present alone,
they offered no additive effect in the presence of PBN. Therefore, PB
N can be used to estimate the radical scavenger properties of an agent
in the heart. However, because of the protective properties of PBN it
self, the results of simultaneous investigations of the effects of oth
er compounds, such as Ca antagonists or lipophilic radical scavengers,
on heart function may be limited.