Gec. Slager et al., THE RIDDLE OF THE LARGE LOSS IN BITE FORCE AFTER FAST JAW-CLOSING MOVEMENTS, Journal of dental research, 77(9), 1998, pp. 1684-1693
In unloading experiments (in which the resistance to a forceful static
bite is suddenly removed); it is shown that the residual bite force (
when the jaw system is arrested shortly after the unloading) is remark
ably small. For example, of a 100-N initial bite force, only 18 N is l
eft after a jaw travel distance of 5.0 mm. The present experiments wer
e designed to study whether the magnitude of the low residual bite for
ce is dependent on the initial bite force, the initial degree of mouth
opening, and the distance of jaw travel. Furthermore, we analyzed whe
ther the low magnitude of the residual force can be attributed to refl
ex events of the jaw muscles or to the force-length properties of the
jaw-closing muscles. It was found that the residual forces are largely
dependent on the distance of jaw travel and are barely sensitive to v
ariations in initial mouth-opening. The relative residual forces are i
ndependent of the magnitude of the initial bite force. The maximum res
idual forces are on the order of 25% of the initial bite force after a
jaw travel of 4.5 mm. The low values of the residual forces cannot be
attributed to reflex events, because it took about 80 ms for the mass
eter;muscles to decrease their force to a 50% level after their excita
tion-was switched off. Furthermore, it was shown that the force-length
properties of the jaw-closing muscles are not responsible for the sma
ll values of the residual forces, since over the trajectories used in
the present experiments, the sarcomere lengths of the jaw-closing musc
les were beyond their optimum. It is suggested that the low residual f
orces are brought about by (1) a non-uniform sarcomere behavior of the
jaw-closing muscles when contracting, or (2) a long-lasting change in
the myofilament system of the closing muscles induced by the sudden s
hortening of muscle fibers.