COMPARISON OF BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITIES OF INTERMITTENT AND CONTINUOUS-INFUSION DOSING OF VANCOMYCIN AGAINST METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS AND ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECALIS
Me. Klepser et al., COMPARISON OF BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITIES OF INTERMITTENT AND CONTINUOUS-INFUSION DOSING OF VANCOMYCIN AGAINST METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS AND ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECALIS, Pharmacotherapy, 18(5), 1998, pp. 1069-1074
Study Objective. To describe the pharmacokinetic profiles of vancomyci
n administered by continuous infusion and intermittent dosing and comp
are the duration of activity of the regimens. Design. Randomized, open
-label, crossover study Setting. Clinical research center at an academ
ic medical center. Subjects. Twelve healthy nonpregnant volunteers age
27.6 +/- 2.3 years. Intervention. Subjects received the following int
ravenous vancomycin regimens: 1 g every 12 hours; 2 g continuous infus
ion over 24 hours; and 1 g continuous infusion over 24 hours. Dosages
were administered with and without gentamicin 2 mg/kg. Measurements an
d Main Results. Serum samples were collected, drug concentrations dete
rmined, and bactericidal activity measured against two isolates each o
f methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecali
s. Subjects had poor tolerability for continuous infusions. Trough con
centration for the intermittent regimen was 5.5 +/- 1.9 mg/ml, and ste
ady-state concentrations were 8.8 +/- 1.6 and 16.9 +/- 1.9 mg/ml for 1
and 2 g continuous infusions, respectively. In general, all regimens
provided bactericidal activity throughout the study interval. Against
one isolate of E. faecalis, 2 g continuous infusion plus gentamicin pr
ovided cidal activity for a significantly greater percentage of the do
sing interval (p<0.001). Conclusion. Continuous infusion does not grea
tly improve the activity of vancomycin and should not be routinely adm
inistered. However, it may prove useful against isolates with reduced
susceptibility to the agent.