T. Tlaskal et al., RESULTS OF PRIMARY AND 2-STAGE REPAIR OF INTERRUPTED AORTIC-ARCH, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 14(3), 1998, pp. 235-242
Objective: Early results of primary and two-stage repair of interrupte
d aortic arch have improved. Experience with different surgical approa
ches should be analysed and compared. Methods: Forty neonates and infa
nts with interrupted aortic arch underwent primary repair (19 patients
) or palliative operation (21 patients). Twenty (50%) patients were fo
llowed-up for 5.1 +/- 4.3 years. All patients were regularly examined
with the aim of determining clinical development, presence of residual
lesions or complications and need for re-intervention. Aortic arch an
d the left ventricular outflow tract growth were assessed by echocardi
ographic examination. Data from hospital and outpatient department rec
ords were analysed. Results: The early mortality was 61.9% after palli
ative operations and 36.8% after the primary repair. Presence of compl
ications (P < 0.001), earlier year of surgery (P < 0.01), bad clinical
condition and acidosis (P < 0.05) represented statistically significa
nt risk factors for death in the whole series. In seven (87.5%) out of
eight early survivors, after the initial palliative operation, closur
e of ventricular septal defect and debanding were done, and in three (
37.5%) patients, re-operation for aortic arch obstruction was also req
uired. Out of 12 patients, after the primary repair, one required earl
y re-operation for persistent left ventricular outflow tract obstructi
on and two needed late re-intervention for left bronchus obstruction.
In three (25%) patients, after the primary repair, left ventricular ou
tflow tract obstruction with a maximal systolic pressure gradient high
er than 30 mmHg developed. At present, all 20 early survivors are aliv
e. Five patients, after palliative operation, are in NYHA class I, but
in three patients, who are in class III or IV, the outcome is influen
ced by severe complications. All patients after the primary repair are
in class I or II. Conclusions: Our experience confirmed better result
s after the primary repair of interrupted aortic arch, which was assoc
iated with lower mortality, prevalence of severe complications and nee
d for re-intervention. Higher prevalence of subaortic stenosis after p
rimary repair could be explained by patient selection early in our exp
erience. We recommend the primary repair of interrupted aortic arch an
d associated heart lesions in neonates, however, in unfavourable condi
tions an individualised surgical approach with initial palliative surg
ery should be considered. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights re
served.