Tape recorders have bean shown to affect measures of voice perturbatio
n. Few studies, however, have been conducted to quantitatively justify
the use or exclusion of certain types of recorders in voice perturbat
ion studies. This study used sinusoidal and triangular waves and synth
esized vowels to compare perturbation measures extracted from directly
digitized signals with those recorded and played back through various
tape recorders, including 3 models of digital audio tape recorders, 2
models of analog audio cassette tape recorders, and 2 models of video
tape recorders. Signal contamination For frequency perturbation value
s was found to be consistently minimal with digital recorders (percent
jitter = 0.01%-0.02%), mildly increased with video recorders (0.05%-0
.10%), moderately increased with a high-quality analog audio cassette
tape recorder (0.15%), and most prominent with a low-quality analog au
dio cassette tape recorder (0.24%). Recorder effect on amplitude pertu
rbation measures was lowest in digital recorders (percent shimmer = 0.
09%-0.20%), mildly to moderately increased in video recorders and a hi
gh-quality analog audio cassette tape recorder (0.25%-0.45%), and most
prominent in a low-quality analog audio cassette tape recorder (0.98%
). The effect of cassette tape material, length of spooled tape, and d
uration of analysis were also tested and are discussed.