In Britain, there are a wide range of agencies providing many types of
service to drug users. Such provision, it is argued, should be monito
red and evaluated in the same way as provision to other client groups.
To this end, the paper focuses on one aspect of drug service evaluati
on; users' views of service providers. Semi-structured qualitative int
erviews were conducted with 124 illicit drug users in rural, urban and
inner city areas of Scotland and the respondents' comments were analy
sed inductively using the software package, Winmax. The study revealed
three main findings. First, there was a high level of consensus among
st users regarding desired and undesired provider characteristics; and
these characteristics held regardless of agency type. Secondly, users
simultaneously retained different expectations of the different agenc
ies and did not consider these agencies to be interchangeable. Thirdly
, gender differences in attitudes to, and use, the different providers
were apparent. The paper concludes that it is necessary to recognize
the fundamental role that process factors, particularly providers' att
itudes, play in terms of drug users' overall perception and evaluation
of services. Additionally, although agencies should aim to provide a
broad range of flexible forms of assistance, providers are not interch
angeable and the continued development of a flexible mixture of intera
ctive drug services and providers is recommended. Finally, drug users
do not provide the definitive statement about the value of drug servic
e provision. Nevertheless, their views and experiences are an importan
t aspect of service evaluation and consequently deserve careful attent
ion from policy, practice and research.