DRUG-USERS VIEWS OF DRUG SERVICE PROVIDERS

Authors
Citation
J. Neale, DRUG-USERS VIEWS OF DRUG SERVICE PROVIDERS, Health & social care in the community, 6(5), 1998, pp. 308-317
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Social Work
ISSN journal
09660410
Volume
6
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
308 - 317
Database
ISI
SICI code
0966-0410(1998)6:5<308:DVODSP>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
In Britain, there are a wide range of agencies providing many types of service to drug users. Such provision, it is argued, should be monito red and evaluated in the same way as provision to other client groups. To this end, the paper focuses on one aspect of drug service evaluati on; users' views of service providers. Semi-structured qualitative int erviews were conducted with 124 illicit drug users in rural, urban and inner city areas of Scotland and the respondents' comments were analy sed inductively using the software package, Winmax. The study revealed three main findings. First, there was a high level of consensus among st users regarding desired and undesired provider characteristics; and these characteristics held regardless of agency type. Secondly, users simultaneously retained different expectations of the different agenc ies and did not consider these agencies to be interchangeable. Thirdly , gender differences in attitudes to, and use, the different providers were apparent. The paper concludes that it is necessary to recognize the fundamental role that process factors, particularly providers' att itudes, play in terms of drug users' overall perception and evaluation of services. Additionally, although agencies should aim to provide a broad range of flexible forms of assistance, providers are not interch angeable and the continued development of a flexible mixture of intera ctive drug services and providers is recommended. Finally, drug users do not provide the definitive statement about the value of drug servic e provision. Nevertheless, their views and experiences are an importan t aspect of service evaluation and consequently deserve careful attent ion from policy, practice and research.