U. Backofen et al., CAPILLARY BATCH INJECTION-ANALYSIS AND CAPILLARY-FLOW INJECTION-ANALYSIS WITH ELECTROCHEMICAL DETECTION - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF BOTH METHODS, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry, 362(2), 1998, pp. 189-193
Capillary batch injection analysis (CBIA) and capillary flow injection
analysis (CFIA) in combination with electrochemical detection as well
as optical detection methods were studied and compared with respect t
o their performance. Despite the differences in technical equipment bo
th techniques share the same idea of reproducible transport and washou
t of nanolitre samples over sensing surfaces. Thus the same electroche
mical flow cell can be used for both CBIA and CFIA. The amperometric a
nd potentiometric CBIA responses were studied under various experiment
al conditions in order to optimise the CBIA set-up. In particular, the
density of the sample solution relative to that of the cell electroly
te had a remarkable effect on the hydrodynamic characteristics of CBIA
. Dispersion in CFIA was investigated using on column UV-detection for
electroosmotic flow (EOF) conditions as well as for gravity flow cond
itions. It is demonstrated for a 75 mu m capillary that the relative b
and broadening of the sample plug under gravity flow is only about twi
ce as large as under EOF. Furthermore, dispersion in a system that inv
olves a chemical reaction between the sample and the carrier solution,
namely CrO72- and Fe2+ has been investigated by amperometric detectio
n and exploited for the determination of dichromate microsamples.