CAPILLARY BATCH INJECTION-ANALYSIS AND CAPILLARY-FLOW INJECTION-ANALYSIS WITH ELECTROCHEMICAL DETECTION - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF BOTH METHODS

Citation
U. Backofen et al., CAPILLARY BATCH INJECTION-ANALYSIS AND CAPILLARY-FLOW INJECTION-ANALYSIS WITH ELECTROCHEMICAL DETECTION - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF BOTH METHODS, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry, 362(2), 1998, pp. 189-193
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Analytical
ISSN journal
09370633
Volume
362
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
189 - 193
Database
ISI
SICI code
0937-0633(1998)362:2<189:CBIACI>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Capillary batch injection analysis (CBIA) and capillary flow injection analysis (CFIA) in combination with electrochemical detection as well as optical detection methods were studied and compared with respect t o their performance. Despite the differences in technical equipment bo th techniques share the same idea of reproducible transport and washou t of nanolitre samples over sensing surfaces. Thus the same electroche mical flow cell can be used for both CBIA and CFIA. The amperometric a nd potentiometric CBIA responses were studied under various experiment al conditions in order to optimise the CBIA set-up. In particular, the density of the sample solution relative to that of the cell electroly te had a remarkable effect on the hydrodynamic characteristics of CBIA . Dispersion in CFIA was investigated using on column UV-detection for electroosmotic flow (EOF) conditions as well as for gravity flow cond itions. It is demonstrated for a 75 mu m capillary that the relative b and broadening of the sample plug under gravity flow is only about twi ce as large as under EOF. Furthermore, dispersion in a system that inv olves a chemical reaction between the sample and the carrier solution, namely CrO72- and Fe2+ has been investigated by amperometric detectio n and exploited for the determination of dichromate microsamples.