Objective. The aim of this paper was to define strain pattern in the h
ost bone following distal femoral resection and implantation of a mass
ive prosthesis. Two methods of coupling the prosthesis to the bone wer
e compared: the Compliant Pre-Stress device, and a standard cemented t
umour prosthesis. Design. The composite femur model was selected to mi
nimize variables. Four femurs were tested before and after implantatio
n. Both coaxial and cantilever loading were applied. Background. Cemen
ted distal femoral replacement following resection of malignant tumour
s has a high failure rate at 5 years and is associated with extensive
bone resorption thought to be secondary to stress shielding. Methods.
Strain was measured in the medial and lateral sides at four levels wit
h physiologic loads applied, in the intact, Compliant Pre-Stress, and
cemented femurs. Repeated measurements were taken. Strains in the impl
anted femur were calculated as percentage of the intact, and statistic
ally analyzed. Results. The most reproducible results were noted in ca
ntilever bending (variability <5%). The Compliant Pre-Stress device de
monstrated a more physiologic strain pattern than the cemented stem. T
he most significant difference between the two implants was in the are
a adjacent to the interface. Conclusion. The Compliant Pre-Stress devi
ce shows less stress shielding than a standard cemented implant. The p
rotocol described and the use of composite femurs demonstrated reprodu
cible results. Relevance Massive prosthesis are commonly used followin
g tumour resection or removal of failed primary joint replacement pros
theses. The failure rate for aseptic loosening for cemented implants i
s 25% at 5 years with significant bone resorption about the implant. C
ompliant Pre-Stress is an innovative technology that allows coupling o
f metallic implants to bone with little stress shielding. This paper a
ims to define the strain patterns about the implant and compare them t
o a standard cemented device. The reduced stress shielding of the Comp
liant Pre-Stress fixation system should guarantee reduced bone loss ar
ound the implant and help to obtain improved clinical results. (C) 199
8 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.