Jl. Mcgrath et al., SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENTS OF ACTIN FILAMENT TURNOVER, FILAMENT FRACTION, AND MONOMER DIFFUSION IN ENDOTHELIAL-CELLS, Biophysical journal, 75(4), 1998, pp. 2070-2078
The analogous techniques of photoactivation of fluorescence (PAF) and
fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) have been applied pr
eviously to the study of actin dynamics in living cells. Traditionally
, separate experiments estimate the mobility of actin monomer or the l
ifetime of actin filaments. A mathematical description of the dynamics
of the actin cytoskeleton, however, predicts that the evolution of fl
uorescence in PAF and FRAP experiments depends simultaneously on the d
iffusion coefficient of actin monomer, D-1 the fraction of actin in fi
laments, FF, and the lifetime of actin filaments, tau (Tardy et at., 1
995, Biophys. J. 69:1674-1682). Here we report the:application of this
mathematical model to the interpretation of PAF and FRAP experiments
in subconfluent bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs). The following
parameters apply for actin in the bulk cytoskeleton of subconfluent B
AECs. PAF: D = 3.1 +/- 0.4 x 10(-8) cm(2)/s, FF = 0.36 +/- 0.04, tau =
7.5 +/- 2.0 min. FRAP: D = 5.8 +/- 1.2 x 10(-8) cm(2)/s, FF = 0.5 +/-
0.04, tau = 4.8. +/- 0.97 min. Differences in the parameters are attr
ibuted to differences in the actin derivatives employed in the two stu
dies and not to inherent differences in the PAF and FRAP techniques. C
ontrol experiments confirm the modeling assumption that the evolution
of fluorescence is dominated by the diffusion of actin monomer, and th
e cyclic turnover of actin filaments, but not by filament diffusion. T
he work establishes the dynamic state of actin in subconfluent endothe
lial cells and provides an improved framework for future applications
of PAF and FRAP.