Kd. Gregory et al., MATERNAL AND INFANT COMPLICATIONS IN HIGH AND NORMAL-WEIGHT INFANTS BY METHOD OF DELIVERY, Obstetrics and gynecology, 92(4), 1998, pp. 507-513
Objective: To estimate the population risks of maternal and infant com
plications with the birth of macrosomic (at least 4000 g) compared wit
h normal weight infants. Methods: Term, singleton infants were identif
ied from the state of Washington's birth event records database for 19
90. Diagnosis codes from the Internal Classification of Diseases (9(th
) revision) were used to identify delivery method and previously defin
ed complications. We adjusted for maternal demographic and clinical fa
ctors using multivariable logistic regression to derive the risk of ea
ch maternal and infant complication. Results: The incidence of macroso
mia was 13% (8815 of 66,086). Vaginal birth of macrosomic infants was
associated with low incidence of complications except for shoulder dys
tocia (11%) and postpartum hemorrhage (5%). Postpartum infection was t
he most common complication for women who had cesarean delivery after
labor (5%), and complications for women who had cesarean without labor
were rare (less than 3%). Neonatal complications were rare. Among inf
ants with shoulder dystocia, the risks of asphyxia (adjusted relative
risk [RR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 2.3), birth trauma (R
R 0.6, 95% CI 0.2, 1.6), long-bone injury (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.6, 2.4), s
eizures (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.0, 25.0), and facial palsy (RR 2.2, 95% CI 0
.2, 44.4) were not significantly different for macrosomic and normal w
eight infants; however, macrosomic infants had a significantly increas
ed risk of Erb palsy (RR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8, 7.5). Conclusion: This popul
ation-based study showed that most macrosomic infants are delivered va
ginally with low rates of maternal and neonatal complications. Macroso
mic infants have higher rates of Erb palsy, but similar rates of other
serious complications of shoulder dystocia when compared with normal
weight infants. (Obstet Gynecol 1998;92: 507-13. (C) 1998 by The Ameri
can College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).