Kj. Totterman et al., TOLERABILITY TO HIGH-DOSES OF FORMOTEROL AND TERBUTALINE VIA TURBUHALER(R) FOR 3 DAYS IN STABLE ASTHMATIC-PATIENTS, The European respiratory journal, 12(3), 1998, pp. 573-579
This randomized, double-blind, crossover study in two parts compared t
olerability to high doses of formoterol (Oxis(R) Turbuhaler(R)) with t
hat of high doses of terbutaline (Bricanyl(R) Turbuhaler(R)). After Ho
lter monitoring at home, 12 patients were treated with 4+4+4 doses of
formoterol Turbuhaler, 6 mu g.dose(-1), (total daily metered dose 72 m
u g) or 4+4+4 doses of terbutaline Turbuhaler, 0.5 mg.dose(-1) (daily
dose 6 mg) given in the morning, after lunch and in the evening, for 3
consecutive days. After a one week washout period at home, patients r
eceived the alternative treatment. Thereafter, 15 other patients recei
ved 8+6+6 doses of formoterol Turbuhaler (total daily metered dose 120
mu g) or potassium 8+6+6 doses of terbutaline Turbuhaler (daily dose
10 mg). Pulse, cardiac frequency, blood pressure, serum potassium, ele
ctrocardiogram and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were
registered at regular intervals and Holter monitoring was applied duri
ng all 4 treatment days. Terbutaline 6 mg showed significantly greater
systemic effects than formoterol 72 mu g on pulse, blood pressure, ca
rdiac frequency and QTc (QT interval corrected for heart rate). Terbut
aline 10 mg had significantly greater effects than formoterol 120 mu g
on serum potassium levels, pulse, cardiac frequency and QTc. No diffe
rences in FEV1 levels mere found. Both drugs were safe and generally w
ell tolerated on both dose levels. In conclusion, high doses of formot
erol Turbuhaler over 3 days were generally safe and well tolerated. Da
ily doses of 6 mg and 10 mg terbutaline Turbuhaler were systemically m
ore potent than 72 mu g and 120 mu g formoterol, respectively. The saf
ety margin thus appears to be wide if patients happen to use extra dos
es of formoterol in addition to those prescribed for regular use.