Background and Objectives: Scoring systems are important tools for qua
lity control and stratification of study populations in intensive cars
medicine. The study aims to systematically evaluate predictive abilit
y and severity classification tv oi the combined physiologic-therapeut
ic Hannover Intensiv Score (HIS). Such data are not existing regarding
medical intensive care medicine. Methods: 1060 consecutive patients (
ICU stay > 4 hours) being admitted to a medical ICU were prospectively
investigated. HIS was determined for all patients each day during ICU
stay. The results were compared to the physiologically based APACHE I
I and to the therapeutically based TISS, which both were determined as
well. Results:HIS provided sufficient discrimination between survival
and [hospital mortality; area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.822] with
differences compared to APACHE II (AUC = 0.838) and TISS (AUC = 0.798
), respectively. During longer course of ICU stay HIS offers better ou
tcome prognostication compared to the unilateral systems with respect
to specificity and total correct classification rate. There was a near
ly Linear increase of hospital mortality with an increase of day-1-HIS
. The same was observed with APACHE II and TISS. Mean day-1-scores for
survivors were significantly higher compared to non-survivors with an
systems (p < 00001). Day-1-HIS moderately correlates with both other
systems (APACE II: r = 0.766; TISS: r = 0.814.) Conclusion: The Hannov
er Intensiv Score as a model of a combined physiologic-therapeutic sco
ring system was successfully validated concerning hospital outcome pre
diction and severity of disease classification in a large medical ICU
population. Thus, for these applications it can be used in similar Ger
man ICUs. A main argument Eor applying the system is the employment of
a fairly small set of easily accessible parameters.