Kl. Barkhouse et al., EFFECT OF IGNORING RANDOM SIRE AND DAM EFFECTS ON ESTIMATES AND STANDARD ERRORS OF BREED COMPARISONS, Journal of animal science, 76(9), 1998, pp. 2279-2286
Data were weights of F-1 calves and weaning weights of top-cross proge
ny from sires and maternal grandsires of 13 breeds. Three analyses wer
e performed on each trait to obtain estimates and standard errors of b
reed effects needed to calculate across-breed EPD and accuracies. Mode
l (R) for records of F-1 progeny contained fixed effects for birth yea
r and date of birth, sex, age and breed of dam, and breed of sire, and
a random residual effect. The second analysis included random effects
for sires (RS), and the third analysis included random effects for si
res and dams (RSD). In maternal analysis of top-cross progeny, model (
R-m) contained fixed effects for cycle of experiment, age of dam, year
of birth, sex, breeds of maternal grandam and grandsire, and breed of
sire, and a random residual effect. In addition, the second and third
analyses fit random effects for maternal grandsires (RSm) and for mat
ernal grandsires and daughters of maternal grandsires (RSDm). Estimate
s of breed of sire effects changed only slightly for different models.
Total variance increased in RSD and RS relative to R. Standard errors
of breed of sire comparisons were underestimated with Model R, compar
ed to Models RS and RSD. Standard errors of other contrasts were gener
ally not affected. Variance components, breed effects, and standard er
rors followed patterns for R-m, RSm, and RSDm similar to those for R,
RS, and RSD. Ignoring random variation due to sires and dams underesti
mated standard errors of breed of sire comparisons.