Aj. Wells et al., MISCLASSIFICATION RATES FOR CURRENT SMOKERS MISCLASSIFIED AS NONSMOKERS, American journal of public health, 88(10), 1998, pp. 1503-1509
Objectives. This paper provides misclassification rates for current ci
garette smokers who report themselves as nonsmokers. Such rates are im
portant in determining smoker misclassification bias in the estimation
of relative risks in passive smoking studies. Methods. True smoking s
tatus, either occasional or regular, was determined for individual cur
rent smokers in 3 existing studies of nonsmokers by inspecting the cot
inine levels of body fluids. The new data, combined with an approximat
ely equal amount in the 1992 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rep
ort on passive smoking and lung cancer, yielded misclassification rate
s that not only had lower standard errors but also were stratified by
sex and US minority/majority status. Results. The misclassification ra
tes for the important category of female smokers misclassified as neve
r smokers were, respectively, 0.8%, 6.0%, 2.8%, and 15.3% for majority
regular, majority occasional, US minority regular, and US minority oc
casional smokers. Misclassification rates for males were mostly somewh
at higher. Conclusions. The new information supports EPA's conclusion
that smoker misclassification bias is small. Also, investigators are a
dvised to pay attention to minority/majority status of cohorts when co
rrecting for smoker misclassification bias.