This article examines theoretical and historical issues raised by Dona
ld Stokes's classic 1960s articles on ''Party Loyalty and the Likeliho
od of Deviating Elections,'' ''On the Existence of Forces Restoring Pa
rty Competition,'' and ''Parties and the Nationalization of Electoral
Forces.'' I use presidential election returns from 1868 to 1996 and a
simple regression model to measure partisan, national, and sub-nationa
l forces in each election. My analysis suggests that the contemporary
American electoral system is significantly more nationalized than the
electoral system of a century ago, but no less partisan, no more volat
ile, and no less subject to competitive reequilibration. (C) 1998 Else
vier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.