This paper investigates the status of the purported explanatory gap be
tween pain phenomena and natural science, when the ''gap'' is thought
to exist due to the special properties of experience designated by ''q
ualia'' or ''the pain quale'' in the case of pain experiences. The pap
er questions the existence of such a property in the case of pain by:
(I) looking at the history of the conception of pain; (2) raising ques
tions from empirical research and theory in the psychology of pain; (3
) considering evidence from the neurophysiological systems of pain; (4
) investigating the possible biological role or roles of pain; and (5)
considering methodological questions of the comparable status of the
results of the sciences of pain in contrast to certain intuitions unde
rpinning ''the explanatory gap'' in the case of pain. Skepticism conce
rning the crucial underlying intuitions seems justified by these consi
derations.