BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY OF IN-STENT-RESTENOSIS - EARLY AND LATE RESULTS OF THE FIRST AND 2ND DILATATION IN FOCAL AND DIFFUSE STENOSIS

Citation
N. Reifart et al., BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY OF IN-STENT-RESTENOSIS - EARLY AND LATE RESULTS OF THE FIRST AND 2ND DILATATION IN FOCAL AND DIFFUSE STENOSIS, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, 87, 1998, pp. 65-71
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
03005860
Volume
87
Year of publication
1998
Supplement
3
Pages
65 - 71
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-5860(1998)87:<65:BAOI-E>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
From January 1996 untill February 1997 6,376 patients were treated by our group with PTCA and 3,859 (60.5 %) received one or several stents. An angiographic followup was achieved in 63 % of the patients with 1, 267 experiencing restenosis (32.8 %). Of those beeing treated with re- PTCA 302 were randomly selected for further analysis. In-stent-resteno sis was treated with rotablator in 8 patients (2.7 %), with eximer las er in 21 (7.0 %) and with another stent in 48 patients (15.9 %). 225 p atients (74.4 %) of this subselection were treated with balloon-angiop lasty only. Mean patient age was 63 +/- 10.2 years, 401 stents had bee n implanted (42.5 % Wiktor, 13.7 % Jomed Site, 12.3 % ACS Multilink, 9 .5 % GR II, and some others), the number of stents per patient was 1.6 8, mean stent length 28.5 mm, mean stent diameter 3.01 +/- 0.3 mm, the time since implantation 142 +/- 76 days. The recurrence appeared as r estenosis in 199 patients (88.4 %) and as a chronic stent occlusion in 26 (11.6 %). In-stent-restenosis was discovered in 94.7 % within the stent and was of focal appearance (restenosic lesion of less than or e qual to 5 mm) in 28.5 % and diffuse (> 5 mm) in 71.5 %. Balloondilatat ion (balloon : artery = 1:1;maximal pressure 11.7 +/- 3.3 bar) was suc cessfull in 98 % of the stenotic lesions and in 18/26 of the chronical ly occluded stents (definition of success: residual stenosis < 50 %, n o major complications). The stenosis decreased from 82.2 % to 20.5 % ( 12.8 % in focally stenosed vessels and 23.6 % in diffuse restenosis). Complications were death in 0.9 %, Q-MI in 0 % CABG in 0.9 %, Non-Q-Ml in 2.4 %, subacute stent thrombosis in 0.5 % and groin bleeding in 1. 8 %. A clinical follow up after 151.7 +/- 87.7 days was achieved in 98 .6 % and an angiographic follow up in 69.1 % of the patients: 1.9 % ha d died (2/4 due to noncardiac disease), no Ml, 6.2 % CABG and 31 % PTC A (TLR 37.2 %). A second restenosis within the stents ocurred in 27.9 % of those with focal disease and in 44.3 % of those with diffuse in s tent restenosis. Conclusions: Restenosis within stents may occurr in a bout 30 % of unselected patients. In 2/3 these stenoses appear diffuse and in 10 % they appear as chronic occlusions. Re-PTCA with balloons is rather simple with a high success rate (even in chronic stent occlu sions) and a low complication rate. The incidence of a second restenos is is acceptably high in focal lesions but appears unacceptable in pat ients with diffuse in-stent-restenosis. Thus the indication for stenti ng should be restricted to patients with clear cut advantage over ball oon-angioplasty alone, e.g. threatening closure, chronic occlusion, ol d savenous veingraft and proximal LAD stenosis.