S. Law et al., THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HISTOLOGICALLY INFILTRATED RESECTION MARGIN AFTERESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER, The American journal of surgery, 176(3), 1998, pp. 286-290
BACKGROUND: Microscopic tumor infiltration of the resection margin aft
er esophageal resection is implicated to influence anastomotic leakage
, tumor recurrence rates, and long-term survival. METHODS: Patients wi
th tumor infiltration of resection margin (RM+) and those without (RM-
) were compared. RESULTS: Of 604 patients, 45 (7.5%) were RM+, Patient
s in the RM+ group had more palliative resections, 76% versus 56%, P =
0.01, Anastomotic leakage rates were 2.2% (RM+) and 4.1% (RM-), P = 1
.0. Excluding hospital deaths, anastomotic recurrences developed in 10
.3% in the RM+ group and 4.9% in the RM- groups, P = 0.15. Although a
positive margin did not increase anastomotic recurrence, a shorter res
ection margin correlated with such recurrence. The mean (SEM) lengths
of resection margins in surgical specimens were 2.7 cm (0.3) and 4.4 c
m (0.1) for those with and without recurrence, P<0.001. Median surviva
l time were 8.8 months (RM+) and 15 months (RM-), P = 0.007. CONCLUSIO
NS: Histologic infiltration of resection margins did not influence lea
kage rate. Anastomotic recurrence was related to the length of resecti
on margin. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.