Another public health crisis: Coming into public view after the AIDS t
ransfusion and the mad cow crises, asbestos-related health risks have
provoked an atmosphere of panic incompatible with calmly planned publi
c: health prevention programs. The avalanche of passionate reactions h
as led to an inextricable dead-end situation. Scapegoats: Faultfinders
have accused a long list of scapegoats-scientists, physicians, expert
s, public health officials, industrial leaders and the medias-bu court
actions do not favor rigorous analysis of health safety dispositions.
What is needed is a pondered examination of the sinister chain of eve
nts which has made such a wasteful situation possible. Meeting public
demands: Prohibiting asbestos cannot solve the problem once and for al
l. Asbestos removal programs must be conducted in terms of a solid ris
k/benefit analysis and more generally, management of environment-relat
ed health risks must be based on specific and credible measures, Witho
ut a real rehabilitation of environmental medicine, there is a genuine
risk of seeing crisis situations override public health decision maki
ng. (C) 1998, Masson, Paris.