EARLY EXPERIENCE WITH INTRAOPERATIVE CAVERNOUS NERVE-STIMULATION WITHPENILE TUMESCENCE MONITORING TO IMPROVE NERVE SPARING DURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
L. Klotz et S. Herschorn, EARLY EXPERIENCE WITH INTRAOPERATIVE CAVERNOUS NERVE-STIMULATION WITHPENILE TUMESCENCE MONITORING TO IMPROVE NERVE SPARING DURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY, Urology, 52(4), 1998, pp. 537-542
Objectives. To determine if intraoperative stimulation of the cavernou
s nerves while monitoring changes in penile tumescence to map the cour
se of these nerves would result in an improvement in nerve sparing and
erectile function after radical prostatectomy. Methods. Patients were
eligible for this pilot study if they were undergoing a radical prost
atectomy and were candidates for a nerve-sparing approach. Erectile fu
nction was assessed by patient self-reporting and questionnaire before
surgery and by patient self-reporting periodically 12 months after su
rgery. A cavernous nerve stimulator and tumescence-monitoring device w
as used during radical 'prostatectomy to identify the course of the ca
vernous nerves and guide the surgeon in avoiding nerve damage. Patient
s were monitored for any evidence of complications and/or adverse even
ts for 1 year from time of surgery. Results. Twenty-six patients were
recruited to the trial. Nerve stimulation and tumescence monitoring wa
s performed in 23 patients. Twenty-one of 23 patients demonstrated a t
umescence response to intraoperative nerve stimulation. Nineteen of 21
patients reported erectile function preoperatively. Seventeen (89%) o
f 19 patients demonstrated a tumescence response during surgery. Sixte
en (94%) of the 17 patients who demonstrated a response to nerve stimu
lation and for whom the surgery was guided by the tumescence response
reported the ability to have erections after surgery. No side effects
due to the use of the device were reported. Only 3 (12%) of 25 patient
s had positive margins confined to the lateral margin and/or apex whos
e modifications associated with nerve sparing could conceivably have a
ltered margin status. Conclusions. These clinical data suggest that an
intraoperative tumescence response to cavernous nerve stimulation may
guide the surgeon in preserving cavernous nerves and improving erecti
le function after radical prostatectomy. UROLOGY 52: 537-542, 1998. (C
) 1998, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.