Recent advances in ultrasound technology, such as the use of high-freq
uency linear transducers, color flow Doppler, and computer-enhanced im
aging, have improved the diagnostic utility of ultrasound. The followi
ng retrospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of sonog
raphic signs of malignancy and to compare sonography to mammography in
157 patients with palpable, biopsy-proven breast carcinomas. The mamm
ogram reports and sonograms were all reviewed. The grade of each mammo
gram was recorded using the American College of Radiology mammogram gr
ading scale. All sonograms were reviewed and assigned a score using an
adaptation of this scale. Of 157 lesions, 121 were read as suspicious
or probable malignancies on mammogram. Thirty-three lesions were read
as benign or normal on mammogram. Three patients did not receive mamm
ograms. All 157 lesions were read as either suspicious or probably mal
ignant on ultrasound. Using the 16 described criteria, high-definition
sonography complements mammography and appears to be a sensitive moda
lity in the evaluation of palpable biopsy-proven breast malignancies.
The diagnostic utility of ultrasound will likely be most important in
the evaluation of nonpalpable breast masses; however, a prospective ra
ndomized trial will need to be performed.