The speed, angular, and alignment distributions of S(D-1(2)) atoms fro
m the ultraviolet photodissociation of OCS have been measured by a pho
tofragment imaging technique. From the excitation wavelength dependenc
e of the scattering distribution of S(D-1(2)), the excited slates acce
ssed by photoabsorption were assigned to the A' Renner-Teller componen
t of the (1)Delta and the A''((1)Sigma(-)) states. It was found that t
he dissociation from the A' state gives rise to high- and low-speed fr
agments, while the A'' slate only provides the high-speed fragment. In
order to elucidate the dissociation dynamics, in particular the bimod
al speed distribution of S atoms, two-dimensional potential energy sur
faces of OCS were calculated fur the C-S stretch and bending coordinat
es by nb initio molecular orbital (MO) configuration interaction (CI)
method. Conical intersections of (1)Delta and (1)Sigma(-) with (1)Pi w
ere found as adiabatic dissociation pathways. Wave packet calculations
on these adiabatic surfaces, however, did not reproduce the low-speed
component of S(D-1(2)) fragments. The discrepancy regarding the slow
S atoms was attributed to the dissociation induced by nonadiabatic tra
nsition from A'((1)Delta) to A'((1)Sigma(+)) in the bending coordinate
. This hypothesis was confirmed by wave packet calculations including
nonadiabatic transitions. The slow recoil speed of S atoms in the nona
diabatic dissociation channel is due to more efficient conversion of b
ending energy into CO rotation than the adiabatic dissociation on the
upper slate surface. By analyzing the experimental data, taking into a
ccount the alignment of S(D-1(2)) atoms, we determined the yield of th
e nonadiabatic transition from the A'((1)Delta) to the ground states t
o be 0.31 in the dissociation at 223 nm. Our theoretical model has pre
dicted a prominent structure in the absorption spectrum due to a Feshb
ach resonance in dissociation, while an action spectrum of jet-cooled
OCS measured by monitoring S(D-1(2)) exhibited only broad structure, i
ndicating the limitation of our model calculations. (C) 1998 American
Institute of Physics.