K. Schurmann et al., SINGLE AND TANDEM STENTS IN SHEEP ILIAC ARTERIES - IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN PATENCY, Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 21(5), 1998, pp. 411-418
Purpose: To compare patency and neointima formation of single and tand
em arterial stents. Methods: In each of six sheep, two Memotherm nitin
ol stents (tandem stents) were inserted into the external iliac artery
on one side and a single stent into the artery on the opposite side.
The size of the iliac lumen was assessed in the proximal, middle, and
distal segments of the stents by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) befor
e, immediately after, and 1 month after implantation when the sheep we
re killed. Neointimal thickness was determined in the proximal, middle
, and distal segments of each stent by light microscopy. Results: All
stents remained patent. There was no significant difference in lumen a
nd neointimal thickness between single and tandem stents. Cranial tand
em stents showed a significantly wider lumen and smaller neointimal th
ickness than caudal tandem stents. In the proximal and distal segments
, the lumen of the stents was significantly smaller and the neointimal
thickness greater than in the middle segment; differences in neointim
al thickness were significant only between the proximal and the middle
segment. Conclusion: In an experimental setting, tandem stents did no
t interfere with one another with regard to patency and neointima form
ation when compared with a single contralateral stent. Neointimal thic
kening after stent insertion seems to be inversely related to the orig
inal arterial diameter.