Objective: To study the effect of using an Intensive Care In formation
System (ICIS) on severity scores and prognostic indices: Acute Physio
logy and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Ph
ysiology Score II (SAPS II), and Mortality Probability Models II (MPM
II). Design: Prospective pilot study. Setting: A 20-bed medical-surgic
al intensive care unit (ICU) in a teaching hospital. Patients: 50 cons
ecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU on a bed equipped with an I
CIS. Interventions: None. Measurements and results: In each patient al
l the physiologic variables, as required by the severity scores, were
both manually charted and recorded by ICIS. ICIS registration resulted
in the extraction of more abnormal values for all physiologic variabl
es (except temperature): p < 0.05. Higher severity scores and mortalit
y prediction were achieved by using ICIS charting: predicted mortality
increased by 15 % for APACHE II compared to manual charting, 25 % for
SAPS II, and 24 % for MPM0. ICIS charting resulted in higher severity
scores and mortality prediction for 29 of the 50 patients using APACH
E II with a mean increase in mortality prediction in this subgroup of
27 %. In the case of SAPS II, ICIS charting resulted in higher scores
in 23 of the 50 patients and in the case of MPM0 in 13 patients, the m
ean increase in mortality in these subgroups being 64 and 148 %, respe
ctively. Conclusions: The use of ICIS charting to acquire the most abn
ormal physiologic values for severity scores and the derived prognosti
c indices results in a higher mortality prediction. Comparison of grou
ps of patients and/or ICUs based on severity scores is impossible with
out standardization of data collection. The mortality prediction model
s have to be revalidated for the use of ICIS charting. While awaiting
this, we suggest that every patient record in local regional, national
, or international ICU databases should be marked as being recorded by
manual or by ICIS charting.