Pb. Rich et al., A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF ATRIO-FEMORAL AND FEMORO-ATRIAL FLOW IN ADULT VENOVENOUS EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE-SUPPORT, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 116(4), 1998, pp. 628-632
Introduction: In the United States, venovenous extracorporeal life sup
port has traditionally been performed with atrial drainage and femoral
reinfusion. (atrio-femoral flow). Although flow reversal (femoro-atri
al flow) mav alter recirculation and extracorporeal flow no direct com
parison of these 2 modes has been undertaken. Objective: Our goal was
to prospectively compare atrio-femoral and femoro-atrial flow in adult
venovenous extracorporeal life support for respiratory failure. Metho
ds: A modified bridge enabling conversion between atrio-femoral and fe
moro-atrial flow was incorporated in the extracorporeal circuit. Bypas
s was initiated in the direction that provided the highest pulmonary a
rterial mixed venous oxygen saturation, and the following measurements
were taken: (1) maximum extracorporeal flow (2) highest achievable pu
lmonary arterial mixed venous oxygen saturation, and (3) flow required
to maintain the same pulmonary arterial mixed venous oxygen saturatio
n in both directions. Flow direction was then reversed, and the measur
ements mere repeated. Data were compared with paired t tests and are p
resented as mean +/- standard deviation. Results: Ten patients were st
udied, and 9 were included in the data analysis. Femoro-atrial bypass
provided (1) higher maximal extracorporeal flow (femoro-atrial flow =
55.6 +/- 9.8 mL/kg per minute, atrio-femoral flow = 51.1 +/- 11.1 mL/k
g per minute; P =.04) and (2) higher pulmonary arterial mixed venous o
xygen saturation (femoro-atrial flow = 89.9% +/- 6.6%, atrio-femoral f
low = 83.2% +/- 4.2%; P =.006); (3) further-more, it required less flo
w to maintain an equivalent pulmonary arterial mixed venous oxygen sat
uration (femoro-atrial flow = 37.0 +/- 12.2 mL/kg per minute, atrio-fe
moral flow = 46.4 +/- 8.8 mL/kg per minute; P =.04). Conclusions: Duri
ng venovenous extracorporeal life support, femoro-atrial bypass provid
ed higher maximal extracorporeal flow higher pulmonary arterial mixed
venous oxygen saturation, and required comparatively less flow to main
tain an equivalent mixed venous oxygen saturation than did atrio-femor
al bypass.