Fd. Rubens et al., PLATELET-RICH PLASMAPHERESIS IN CARDIAC-SURGERY - A METAANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT ON TRANSFUSION REQUIREMENTS, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 116(4), 1998, pp. 641-647
Objective: Our purpose was to determine whether intraoperative platele
t-rich plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery is effective in reducing the
proportion of patients exposed to allogeneic red cell transfusions. Me
thods: A systematic search for prospective, randomized trials of plate
let-rich plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery, using MEDLINE, HEALTHSTAR,
Current Contents, ''Biological Abstracts,'' and EMBASE/Excerpta Medic
a up to August 1997, was completed. Trials were included if they repor
ted either the proportion of patients exposed to allogeneic red cells
or the units of allogeneic red cells transfused, Trials were abstracte
d by 2 independent investigators and the quality of trial design was a
ssessed with the use of a validated scale. Results: Seventeen referenc
es met the inclusion criteria (1369 patients [675 control: 694 platele
t-rich plasma-pheresis]). Platelet-rich plasmapheresis reduced the lik
elihood of exposure to allogeneic red cells in cardiac surgery (odds r
atio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.27, 0.72, P =.001), Platelet-rich
plasmapheresis had a small but statistically significant effect on bo
th the volume of blood lost in the first 24 hours (weighted mean diffe
rence -102 mL; 95% confidence interval -148, -55 mL, P<.0001) and the
mean units transfused (weighted mean difference -0.33 units; 95% confi
dence interval -0.43, -0.23, P <.0001), However, platelet-rich plasmap
heresis was only marginally effective (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence
interval 0.34, 2.01, P =.68) for ''good'' quality trials, whereas it
appeared very effective in trials with poor methodologic quality (odds
ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.17, 0.62, P=.0007), Conclusions
: Although platelet-rich plasmapheresis appeared effective in decreasi
ng the proportion of patients receiving transfusions after cardiac ope
rations, the quality of most of the supporting trials was Low and the
benefit was small in trials of good quality, Further clinical trials s
hould be completed.