Rj. Commisso et al., RESULTS OF RADIUS SCALING EXPERIMENTS AND ANALYSIS OF NEON K-SHELL RADIATION DATA FROM AN INDUCTIVELY DRIVEN Z-PINCH, IEEE transactions on plasma science, 26(4), 1998, pp. 1068-1085
The K-shell radiated energy (yield) from neon Z-pinch implosions with
annular, gas-puff nozzle radii of 1, 1.75, and 2.5 cm was measured for
implosion times from 50 to 300 ns while systematically keeping the im
plosion kinetic energy nearly constant. The implosions were driven by
the Hawk inductive-storage generator at the 0.65-MA level. Initial neu
tral-neon density distributions from the nozzles were determined with
laser interferometry. Measured yields are compared with predictions fr
om zero-dimensional (0-D) scaling models of ideal, one-dimensional (1-
D) pinch behavior to both benchmark the scaling models, and to determi
ne their utility for predicting K-shell yields for argon implosions of
200 to >300 ns driven by corresponding currents of 4 to 9 MA, such as
envisioned for the DECADE QUAD. For all three nozzles, the 0-D models
correctly predict the Z-pinch mass for maximum yield. For the 1- and
1.75-cm radius nozzles, the scaling models accurately match the measur
ed yields if the ratio of initial to final radius (compression ratio)
is assumed to be 8:1, For the 2.5-cm radius nozzle, the measured yield
s are only one-third of the predictions. Analysis of K-shell spectral
measurements suggest that as much as 70% (50%) of the imploded mass is
radiating in the K-shell for the 1-cm (1.75-cm) radius nozzle, That f
raction is only 10% for the 2.5-cm radius nozzle, The 0-D scaling mode
ls are useful for predicting 1-D-like K-shell radiation yields (better
than a factor-of-two accuracy) when a nominal (approximate to 10:1) c
ompression ratio is assumed. However, the compression ratio assumed in
the models is only an ''effective'' quantity, so that further interpr
etations based on the 0-D analysis require additional justification. T
he lower-than-predicted yield for the 2.5-cm radius nozzle is associat
ed with larger radius and not with longer implosion time, and is proba
bly a result of two-dimensional effects.