Factors affecting the accuracy with which adults could assess the age
of unfamiliar male faces aged between 5 and 70 years were examined. In
the first experiment twenty-five 'young' adult subjects, aged 16-25,
and twenty-five 'old' adults, aged 51-60, were used. Each subject saw
five versions of three different faces: these consisted of an original
version of each face and four manipulated versions of it. The manipul
ations consisted of mirror reversal, pseudo-cardioidal strain, thresho
lding, and elimination of all but the internal features of the face. T
he second experiment was similar except that a between-subjects design
was used: each subject saw three faces for each age category of targe
t face, but was exposed to only a single type of manipulation (plus a
set of 'original' faces which were identical for all groups, so that t
he comparability of the different groups in age estimation could be ch
ecked). Results from both experiments were similar. Age estimates for
unmanipulated 'original' faces were highly accurate, although subjects
were most accurate with target faces that were within their own age r
ange. Results for the manipulated faces implied that the importance of
cardioidal strain as a necessary and sufficient cue to age may have b
een overestimated in previous reports: subjects' age estimates were ac
curate when cardioidal strain was absent from the stimulus, and poor w
hen cardioidal strain was the only cue available.