This article draws on the history of the hearsay rule, and on recent d
ecisions of the European Court Of Human Rights, to argue that the righ
t to confrontation should be recognised as a basic principle of the la
w of evidence, and that aspects of the Law Commission's proposals for
reform of the hearsay rule, and of the Home Office's proposals for res
trictions on the right of cross-examination, are therefore unsatisfact
ory.