Hm. Hassoba et al., ANTIENVELOPE ANTIBODIES ARE PROTECTIVE AGAINST GBV-C REINFECTION - EVIDENCE FROM THE LIVER-TRANSPLANT MODEL, Journal of medical virology, 56(3), 1998, pp. 253-258
An assay for the detection of antibody against the second envelope (E2
) protein of GB virus type C (GBV-C) has been developed. Early reports
suggested that this antibody was a marker of viral clearance, yet it
is unknown whether anti-E2 is protective against further GBV-C infecti
on. The primary aims were to determine (1) if posttransplantation immu
nosuppression alters the prevalence of anti-E2; and (2) if anti-E2 pos
itivity pretransplantation protects against acquisition of GBV-C infec
tion posttransplantation. Fifty-four recipients who underwent orthotop
ic liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease of nonviral etiol
ogies were tested for GBV-C RNA using a PCR-based assay and anti-E2 an
tibodies by an enzyme-linked immunoassay. Anti-E2 was present in 35% a
nd in 46% of patients pre- and posttransplantation, respectively. Anti
-E2 positivity pretransplantation was strongly associated with anti-E2
positivity after transplantation (P < 0.001); 83% of patients with an
ti-E2 prior to transplantation remained anti-E2-positive after transpl
antation. A negative association between presence of GBV-C viremia and
presence of anti-Ea was found in all patients tested either prior to
or following transplantation (P = 0.03). Acquisition of GBV-C infectio
n was significantly tower in patients who were anti-E2-positive prior
to transplantation (2/13) compared to those who were anti-E2-negative
(12/26) (P = 0.05). It is concluded that immunosuppression does not re
duce the prevalence of anti-E2 after transplantation in those who are
seroreactive prior to transplantation. Anti-E2 appears to be a neutral
izing antibody whose presence at the time of liver transplantation pro
tects against acquisition of GBV-C infection in the peritransplantatio
n period. J. Med. Virol. 56:253-258, 1998. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.