COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO EFFICACY OF ROXITHROMYCIN AND ERYTHROMYCIN AGAINST A STRAIN OF METHICILLIN-SUSCEPTIBLE STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS

Citation
Pg. Danias et al., COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO EFFICACY OF ROXITHROMYCIN AND ERYTHROMYCIN AGAINST A STRAIN OF METHICILLIN-SUSCEPTIBLE STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 32(1), 1998, pp. 51-54
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,"Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
07328893
Volume
32
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
51 - 54
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-8893(1998)32:1<51:CIAIEO>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The in vitro and in vivo efficacy of roxithromycin was compared with t hat of erythromycin, against a methicillin-susceptible strain of Staph ylococcus epidermidis. We performed standard in vitro testing (MIC, MB C, and time-kill kinetics) for roxithromycin, erythromycin, and rifamp in. Both macrolides were bacteriostatic in vitro. There was no signifi cant difference in microbial survival between erythromycin and roxithr omycin groups in the time-kill kinetics (p = 0.3). For the in vivo exp eriments, using the rabbit experimental endocarditis model, roxithromy cin was found to be inferior to erythromycin in decreasing the microbi al burden of the endocardial vegetations (p < 0.05). Rifampin was high ly effective, both in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, the efficacy o f roxithromycin was poor and inferior to erythromycin against a strain of methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.