VOLATILE ANESTHETICS HAVE DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS ON RECOMBINANT M1 AND M3 MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RECEPTOR FUNCTION

Citation
Gw. Nietgen et al., VOLATILE ANESTHETICS HAVE DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS ON RECOMBINANT M1 AND M3 MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RECEPTOR FUNCTION, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 81(4), 1998, pp. 569-577
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
00070912
Volume
81
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
569 - 577
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0912(1998)81:4<569:VAHDOR>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Muscarinic acetylcholine signalling plays major roles in regulation of consciousness, cognitive Functioning, pain perception and circulatory homeostasis. Halothane has been shown to inhibit mi muscarinic signal ling. However, no comparative data are available for desflurane, sevof lurane or isoflurane, nor have the anaesthetic effects on the m3 subty pe (which is also prominent in the brain) been studied. Therefore, we have investigated the effects of these compounds on isolated mi and m3 muscarinic receptor function. Defolliculated Xenopus oocytes expressi ng recombinant mi or m3 muscarinic or (for comparison) AT(1A) angioten sin II receptors were voltage clamped, and Ca2+-activated Cl- currents (I-Cl(Ca)) induced by acetyl-beta-methylcholine (Mch) or angiotensin II were measured in the presence of clinically relevant concentrations of halothane, sevoflurane, desflurane or isoflurane. To determine the site of action of the volatile anaesthetics we compared anaesthetic e ffects on mi, m3 and AT(1A) receptor function and studied the effects of volatile anaesthetics on signalling induced by intracellular inject ion of the second messenger IP3. Desflurane had a biphasic effect on m i signalling, enhancing at a concentration of 0.46 mmol litre(-1) but depressing at 0.92 mmol litre(-1). A similar, although not significant , trend was observed with m3 signalling. Isoflurane had no effect on m i signalling, but profoundly inhibited m3 signalling. Sevoflurane depr essed the function of mi and m3 signalling in a dose-dependent manner. Halothane, similar to its known effect on mi signalling, dose-depende ntly depressed m3 function. I-Cl(Ca), induced by intracellular injecti ons of IP3 were unaffected by all four anaesthetics. Similarly, none o f the anaesthetics tested affected AT(1A) signalling. Absence of inter ference with AT(1A) signalling and intracellular pathways suggest that the effects of anaesthetics On muscarinic signalling most likely resu lt from interactions with the mi or m3 receptor molecule. Multiple int eraction sites with different affinities may explain the biphasic resp onse to desflurane. Anaesthetic-specific effects on closely related re ceptor subtypes suggest defined sites of action for volatile anaesthet ics on the receptor protein.