Gw. Nietgen et al., VOLATILE ANESTHETICS HAVE DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS ON RECOMBINANT M1 AND M3 MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RECEPTOR FUNCTION, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 81(4), 1998, pp. 569-577
Muscarinic acetylcholine signalling plays major roles in regulation of
consciousness, cognitive Functioning, pain perception and circulatory
homeostasis. Halothane has been shown to inhibit mi muscarinic signal
ling. However, no comparative data are available for desflurane, sevof
lurane or isoflurane, nor have the anaesthetic effects on the m3 subty
pe (which is also prominent in the brain) been studied. Therefore, we
have investigated the effects of these compounds on isolated mi and m3
muscarinic receptor function. Defolliculated Xenopus oocytes expressi
ng recombinant mi or m3 muscarinic or (for comparison) AT(1A) angioten
sin II receptors were voltage clamped, and Ca2+-activated Cl- currents
(I-Cl(Ca)) induced by acetyl-beta-methylcholine (Mch) or angiotensin
II were measured in the presence of clinically relevant concentrations
of halothane, sevoflurane, desflurane or isoflurane. To determine the
site of action of the volatile anaesthetics we compared anaesthetic e
ffects on mi, m3 and AT(1A) receptor function and studied the effects
of volatile anaesthetics on signalling induced by intracellular inject
ion of the second messenger IP3. Desflurane had a biphasic effect on m
i signalling, enhancing at a concentration of 0.46 mmol litre(-1) but
depressing at 0.92 mmol litre(-1). A similar, although not significant
, trend was observed with m3 signalling. Isoflurane had no effect on m
i signalling, but profoundly inhibited m3 signalling. Sevoflurane depr
essed the function of mi and m3 signalling in a dose-dependent manner.
Halothane, similar to its known effect on mi signalling, dose-depende
ntly depressed m3 function. I-Cl(Ca), induced by intracellular injecti
ons of IP3 were unaffected by all four anaesthetics. Similarly, none o
f the anaesthetics tested affected AT(1A) signalling. Absence of inter
ference with AT(1A) signalling and intracellular pathways suggest that
the effects of anaesthetics On muscarinic signalling most likely resu
lt from interactions with the mi or m3 receptor molecule. Multiple int
eraction sites with different affinities may explain the biphasic resp
onse to desflurane. Anaesthetic-specific effects on closely related re
ceptor subtypes suggest defined sites of action for volatile anaesthet
ics on the receptor protein.