FORAGE QUALITY AND FEED-INTAKE RESPONSES OF CATTLE TO IMPROVED PASTURES, TREE KILLING AND STOCKING RATE IN OPEN EUCALYPT WOODLANDS OF NORTH-EASTERN AUSTRALIA
Aj. Ash et Jg. Mcivor, FORAGE QUALITY AND FEED-INTAKE RESPONSES OF CATTLE TO IMPROVED PASTURES, TREE KILLING AND STOCKING RATE IN OPEN EUCALYPT WOODLANDS OF NORTH-EASTERN AUSTRALIA, Journal of Agricultural Science, 131, 1998, pp. 211-219
The effects of oversewing introduced grasses and legumes, tree killing
and stocking rate on simulated diet quality and feed intake of cattle
were studied in an open eucalypt woodland in the semi-arid tropics of
north-eastern Australia in 1990. Rainfall during the experimental per
iod was above average, producing good conditions for pasture growth, w
hich resulted in little influence of stocking rate on pasture or dieta
ry attributes. During the growing season, forage quality, as measured
by nitrogen concentration and in vitro digestibility, was higher in so
wn pasture than in native pasture, and higher in plots with live trees
than in plots with killed trees. Treatment differences in herbage qua
lity disappeared later in the year when pastures senesced. In sown pas
ture treatments, there was no effect of tree killing on legume (Stylos
anthes spp.) quality. However, Stylosanthes made a greater contributio
n to the diet of cattle grazing in wooded paddocks than in paddocks wh
ere trees had been killed. The proportion of Stylosanthes in the diet
reached a peak in May and then declined. Oversewing increased both die
t quality and feed intake while, to a lesser extent, killing trees res
ulted in generally lower diet quality and feed intake. Estimates of li
veweight change were made from the quantities of energy and protein co
nsumed by the cattle. As expected, large increases in liveweight gain
were predicted to occur in oversewn pastures compared with native past
ures. However, estimates indicated that animal performance may be bett
er where trees are left intact rather than killed. While carrying capa
city is greatly increased with the removal of trees, this may be at th
e expense of individual animal performance. Possible reasons for this
significant negative response in dietary attributes and predicted live
weight gain to tree killing are discussed.